Skip to content

The Democrat debate … ten fake people.

September 14, 2019

Good afternoon folks! What a great time to be alive and living in the United States led by a President who actually cares about America and American citizens!

I watched around five (5) minutes of the Democrat “debate” the other night. That’s five minutes of certified b.s. I willingly don’t want back! I’ve never seen ten people one on stage who were as phony as that group. From the fake Mexican Beto, to ‘horizontal’ Harris, to ‘Spartacus’ Booker, and the fake Indian … I couldn’t take it a minute longer. I knew instantly the debate wasn’t really going to be a ‘debate’ by the needless, classless attack by Kamala Harris against President Trump. Not to be out-done, Beto follows up saying the lunatic who shot a bunch of people in El Paso was ‘inspired’ by President Trump. Utter nonsense and obvious desperation. I watched some highlights the next day of Beto’s, “Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR15 …” and the Asian guy giving $1,000 a month to ten people, and Castro suggesting Sleepy Joe of being senile. All of them spewing how they’re going to provide medical care for everyone, the fake climate crisis, and on and on. Rush Limbaugh pointed out that not one moderator brought up the economy, or unemployment, or job creation to any of the candidates, nor did any of them volunteer any information on how to “improve” those things. LOLOLO freaking LLLL!!!

Moving along here. The Democrats feel like they have their foot in the door with gun-control. They probably do. The media is pushing it very big time, along with businesses caving into pressure and some Republicans all of whom can’t seem to grasp the meaning of the words in the 2nd Amendment; actually, any part of the Constitution it seems. “Red flag” laws, bans on scary looking guns and “clips that hold a lot of bullets” are what’s supposed to stop mass shootings. A bunch of retailers have requested that people don’t openly carry guns in their stores. Yep, that’s going to do it. Geez, why didn’t I think of that?

Speaking of problem solving. (I just can’t stay on topic!) There is definitely a drunk-driving problem which has to be addressed:

Maybe to curb the number of people killed by drunk driving we should make it much more difficult to get a driver’s license if people consume alcoholic beverages. We need to  include on the driver’s license application the question, “Do you, or anyone you live with or know, consume alcoholic beverages?” “If you answered ‘yes,’ please proceed to window number 13 for further assistance.” Now, that means the age to drive would have to be raised to twenty one, but that doesn’t infringe on anyone’s rights. And if it saves just one life, then it’s worth it! Perhaps we could make it so if a person drinks a beer they have to wait a couple of hours before driving … maybe take a nap! Better yet, require every auto maker to out-fit every vehicle with a breath-a-lizer so the vehicle won’t start if it detects any alcohol. Hmmm … this sounds like making potential criminals out of law-abiding citizens. Where did I hear that before?

I know this “sounds” like I’m being facetious and I am. But using the same argument presented to us by the gun control freaks … do you know anyone who has been injured in a major car accident? I do, a few, and I can tell you they aren’t the same as before the accident and never will be.

The folks in the government can’t control everything, though I promise they want to and are trying hard to get there. As sad and tragic any shooting is, every “idea” these people are coming up with are meaningless in stopping mass shootings. They will get these stupid red-flag laws and guns bans in place … then another shooting; then they’ll have to “do something” else. Then another, until the 2nd Amendment is gone. And folks when that’s gone every other guaranteed right in the Constitution will be too.

IMG_0342

Grieve, but don’t buy into the lies about 9/11/2001

September 11, 2019

As I listen to the various talk show hosts invite people to tell where they were and what they were doing on Sept. 11, 2001, I just shake my head with sadness. That sadness encompasses me every year as I too recall the utter tragic events of that day. Generally what I write concerning 9/11/2001 isn’t popular especially among conservatives, I can never escape the first thoughts racing through my mind as I watched the World Trade Center buildings collapse. “Someone is setting off explosives inside those buildings!!!” I could see it happening and I believe more than ever those planes didn’t cause the collapse of those buildings. No freaking way! Anyway, through the years I’ve taken obscene criticism from conservatives for the “conspiracy theory” of thinking our benevolent government played a large part in murdering around 3,000 innocent people. I’ve done a fair amount of research into the matter and the more I did, the more I know sinister forces within our government were at work then and are still. I find it funny (as in odd … not humorous), that conservatives in general know the government lies to the American people regularly, especially during the eight long agonizing years of the Obama administration. Yet, when it comes to the tragic events of 9/11/2001, they (conservatives) buy into the lies of the 9/11 Commission of how and why those events happened and who was responsible. Here’s what we’re expected to believe … in less than five minutes:

I suggest, not that it makes any difference, because eighteen years later, “Never Forget” has all but been forgotten and the truth will never be known … at least by us regular people, to get a book written by David Ray Griffin, The New Pearl Harbor Revisited. Better yet, click RIGHT HERE for a free read of his original book. You’ll find the official explanation is nothing but lies. The ‘Revisited’ book is simply an updated version:

The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, provides a chapter-by-chapter updating of the information provided in that earlier book. It shows that the case against the official account constructed by independent researchers—who now include architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, politicians, and former military officers—is far stronger than it was in 2004, leaving no doubt that 9/11 was a false-flag operation …

Again, I shake my head listening to the total b.s. accounting on every radio show of what happened. May the people responsible for 9/11/2001 rot in hell for eternity.

maxresdefault

 

Lets not stop at just banning guns and bullets …

September 8, 2019

I just want to tell folks that Walmart banning ‘assault, military-style’ weapons and open carry in their stores really gives me feeling of safety I’ve never had before. Walmart, Walgreens, CVS and Kroger are all in for ‘doing something.’ I read an article a couple of weeks ago which kinda praised Walmart, yet at the same time castigated the place because they will still sell those dastardly shotguns and shotgun ammunition which could ‘tear a person in half!’ So, despite the progress Walmart and other retail chains are making to combat (whoa!) gun violence, they’re still way short of the liberal goal.

IMG_0342

Now personally I pray they also will ban the sales of beer, wine and tobacco products. And those benevolent pharmacies need to shut down immediately! I believe alcohol and tobacco products kill more people than gun violence and isn’t there a drug crisis? I mean come on, lets do this thing right! While we’re at it, lets focus a little on the climate change crisis and get rid of the damn meat and poultry sections and the BBQ grills and Walmart needs to stop selling gasoline …

 

 

Climate change crisis … utter nonsense

September 5, 2019

What an utter waste of time for a non-existent problem. Complete nonsense. The climate is changing and has been changing since the beginning of time. The sinister part of this hoax is that it is all designed to gain complete control over society and industry globally. This is a media and socialist driven hoax exactly like ‘gun violence’ ‘racism’ and ‘inequality’ all the while ignoring genuine problems such as the planned and financed invasions of western Europe and the U.S. by third world countries. It’s sad really that so many people are handing over their rights and liberties for things that will ultimately destroy them, their businesses, their culture and their future generations.

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/climate-forum-2020-democrats-134646681.html

We have people like AOC who just six months ago didn’t even know what a garbage disposal was leading the charge in climate change (the world will end in 10 years), gun control, and racism.

Oh, and if you are ignorant enough to think for a second this isn’t about total control …

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2019/09/05/here-are-some-of-the-worst-things-dems-candidates-said-during-cnn-town-hall-n2552642

The joke is on us.

The government has no authority to impose gun-control.

September 3, 2019

“Do something!!!” That’s the cry of people who have been conditioned into believing that banning ‘scary’ looking firearms and magazines that hold more than ten rounds will actually prevent a mass shooting. I’m just going to start this off with this; I do not trust the likes of Beto O’Rourke, Liz Warren, (wants to ‘investigate’ the NRA!) Bernie Sanders or Joe Biden to protect me, my wife or my property. I don’t trust the government period to protect anything, especially anything on a personal level. I think anyone who does is an absolute fool. Every Democrat is nothing but a socialist/communist who ultimate goal is to confiscate every privately owned firearm. These guys/gals can’t even control illegal border crossings … also we can see how well those in the government have waged the ‘war on drugs.’ Yet, they want to ‘fix gun violence?’

Moving along on the topic of ‘gun-control,’ it is not the government’s job or responsibility to ban or even control privately owned weapons. The job of the government is to uphold and protect what is written in the Constitution whether they like what’s there or not. Whether or not private citizens like what rights are guaranteed in the Constitution, they have zero authority to infringe on those rights of law-abiding people.

Then we have this argument, “People don’t need an ‘assault rifle’ with a thirty round magazine to protect their homes, or hunt deer!”

“Needing” something has nothing to do with the right to own it. And the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting or target/sport shooting.

1_vkqrPbkx1tavlE6piDB52A

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The above wording of the 2nd Amendment should read, “Because a well regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” because that is exactly what is meant by it. A “free state” cannot be secure unless the people are armed.

I have to tell you, I’m against ‘red flag’ laws, banning any kind of firearm and/or magazines that can hold more than ten rounds. We already have in place a national, universal, government run back ground check system. What the Democrats want in leading up to confiscation is back ground checks for private sales of all guns, a registering system of any and all privately owned guns … even guns which are transferred privately to family members.

All this stuff is utter nonsense and will do absolutely nothing to stop the next mass shooting. The ‘mass shooting’ in Odessa, Tx. last week getting all the press, is nothing but another weekend in Chicago, Baltimore, New York, Detroit etc. and none of the crimes in those Democrat run cities ever get press coverage.

Last year around 65 people died in ‘mass shootings’ across the U.S. Over 400 illegal aliens are charged with murder every year and we don’t hear a thing about it. Which is a bigger problem?

The bottom line is, the government can’t ‘fix’ a mass shooting ‘problem.’ In reality, they don’t want to. A certain amount of death is acceptable to the Democrats if they can use it to reach their ultimate goal of disarming the American public. We cannot give them anything, nothing, nada, zip, zero, zilch as far as gun-control is concerned, knowing what their goal is. Someone give me one reason why we should trust the government to protect us. They not only can’t, they won’t. The Congress damn sure won’t give up their protection. They will continue to have walls around their homes and armed guards protecting them in their travels and yet they want to take away any protection we regular people have. But you know, even if they did give up their private security, I’m giving up mine.

Focusing on bringing some morality back into the family unit could go a long way in preventing people from becoming mass shooters. But no, we have to be ‘tolerant’ at the expense of our children. That is a little off topic, but this is where we’re headed, teaching very young children to “twerk …” There is no doubt the mass shooting ‘problem’ is in the break down of morality in the American family unit.

Liz Warren still sucking up to Native Americans … and they fall for it.

August 22, 2019

Isn’t it curious how Democrats like Liz Warren are so concerned about Native Americans since she’s been exposed as being a fraud? The woman is a fiercely anti-gun, house to house confiscation loony liberal. Right now she’s spearheading a bill to strip away the Medal of Honor awardees of their medals they got after the Wounded Knee Massacre. What I find about sick about these utter fools (Warren and Democrats and a lot of Republicans) is how they cry and blow snot over innocent people being slaughtered, and the slaughter took place after they were disarmed, with no means to protect themselves or fight back.

Yet they want us to be disarmed via their absurd gun-control agenda. We all know that stuff could never happen with the government, military and the police protecting us …

Nazi & Russian Gun Control … and a side note to protect your children from the loony left. Edited.

August 21, 2019

Lets arrive at the real conclusion of what the Democrats want for America …

http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/NaziLawEnglish.htm

Nazi Weapons Law of November 11, 1938
Regulations Against Jews’ Possession of Weapons
11 November 1938
With a basis in § 31 of the Weapons Law of 18 March 1928 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 265), Article III of the Law on the Reunification of Austria with Germany of 13 March 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 237), and § 9 of the Fuhrer and Chancellor’s decree on the administration of the Sudeten-German districts of 1 October 1928 (Reichsgesetzblatt 1, p. 1331 ) are the following ordered:
§ 1
Jews (§ 5 of the First Regulations of the German Citizenship Law of 14 November 1935, Reichsgesetzblatt 1, p. 1332) are prohibited from acquiring. Possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons. Those now possessing weapons and ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority.
§ 2
Firearms and ammunition found in a Jew’s possession will be forfeited to the government without compensation.
§ 3
The Minister of the Interior may make exceptions to the Prohibition in § 1 for Jews who are foreign nationals. He can entrust other authorities with this power.
§ 4
Whoever willfully or negligently violates the provisions of § 1 will be punished with imprisonment and a fine. In especially severe cases of deliberate violations, the punishment is imprisonment in a penitentiary for up to five years.
§ 5
For the implementation if this regulation, the Minister of the Interior waives the necessary legal and administrative provisions.
§ 6
This regulation is valid in the state of Austria and in the Sudeten-German districts.
Berlin, 11 November 1938
Minister of the Interior
Frick

~~~

I edited this post to include part of an article I just read. These are a few proposals by the far-left freaks who used the dead bodies of their own classmates to gain notoriety and fame … David Hogg, who wasn’t even at the school when the shooting took place at Parkland is the most disgusting person I’ve seen in a very long time. Of course the left and the media love him. That’s the way they ‘roll.’

A ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines
Raising the minimum age for gun possession to 21
A multi-step approval process to own a gun that would be overseen by a law enforcement agency and include background checks, in-person interviews, personal references, gun safety training and a waiting period of 10 days for each gun purchase
A national gun licensing and registry program
Disarming gun owners who have become a risk to themselves or others
A national gun buy-back and disposal program
The appointment of a National Director of Gun Violence Prevention to report directly to the president to work with federal agencies including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control

The stuff looks a lot like the stuff from the Nazi Weapons Law.

HERE is the article

~~~~~~~~~~~~

As for Russia. Keep in mind Stalin murdered around 50 million unarmed people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control_in_the_Soviet_Union

Of course this stuff could never happen in the United States. Just ask any Democrat.

~~~

Here’s the “side note…”

Yet another drag queen reading to kids exposed for sexual crimes. This time it’s prostitution

dqsh_sex_offender_1_810_500_75_s_c1

Via: Life Site News

August 20, 2019 (MassResistance) — Yet another “Drag Queen” reading to children has been revealed to have been convicted of a disturbing sex-related crime.
Earlier this year, research by our Houston MassResistance leader Tracy Shannon (she’s now our Texas MassResistance leader) revealed that not one, but TWO convicted child molesters were allowed to read to children in the Houston Public Library as part of its Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) program. City officials quickly shut it down.
MassResistance has repeatedly demonstrated that Drag Queen Story Hours — heavily promoted by the LGBT movement — bring in the worst possible people to children’s events. The organizers have even stated that their purpose is to give children “unabashedly queer role models.” Drag Queens — homosexual men who dress up as garish impersonations of women — are terribly dysfunctional people on several levels.

MORE RIGHT ABOUT HERE

 

%d bloggers like this: